May 10th, 2012

Hainako.

I've lost all appetite. I hate it when we fight. 

We've been having a great couple of days--no fighting. I've been doing my best to be appreciative and considerate of him. And I think he's been doing the same. But nooo, we just have to find a way to get on each other's nerves. 

I don't know if I'm overly sensitive, but it started when he suggested something was wrong with me. Sabi niya, babe wag ka magagalit ha, but I think something's wrong with your psychomotor skills. All this he got while I was attempting to open a can of tuna. Dude, I'm not domesticated. In a normal scenario, I wouldn't even be attempting to open a friggin' can of tuna. Someone does that for me at home. But I took the initiative because I knew he had a headache and I was thinking when was the last time he's eaten. I wanted to cook dinner for him so that he could spend time in bed to rest. Tapos mapipintasan pa ako ng ganon. What's worse was the insinuation that I should have it checked, like I was abnormal or something. Just because I can't open a friggin can of tuna properly. 

So I stopped talking to him for a while, and he tried to make amo. He blocked my path in the door, and I shoved him using my fists because he wouldn't let me through. Fine, that was wrong. Lol. But he wouldn't let me through! And he said that it hurt, which at first I didn't believe because I'm not that strong. 

Anyway, a few minutes later, his mood entirely shifted. He was banging pots and pans, and clearly making it known that he was angry. Sabi ko, nagdadabog ka ba? And he said, oo. I asked why, and he said, "ang sakit e." Hainako. I got a sinking feeling in my stomach. Eto nanaman kami. 

He's now eating outside, while I'm inside sulking in my room, writing this entry. I know I should say sorry, but I also know that saying sorry while he's in this kind of mood will only make things worse. He won't accept my apology easily. And then I'll start to get defensive, and then I'll remember his earlier slight, and this will escalate into a full-blown fight. 

I thought we were doing so well. Sayang. And the market corrects.

Posted by anokaya at 08:00 PM | do go on

(pu)Wit ni Makoy for this week

Posted by soulfly at 02:45 PM | do go on

Push Back: My TM Graduation Speech! :)

Last night, I finally completed all 10 speeches in the Competent Communicator manual Whew. After two long years of TOPS membership, I finally, finally get upgraded from TM to CC!

Last night was particularly special for me because I was out of my comfort zone. True, I am used to speaking. I've spoken in front of audiences big and small--from an audience of 10, to an audience of 100,000+ (during the campaign season). I've spoken in a multitude of countries--from the Philippines, to Malaysia, to Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, and even Bangladesh! I have a number of speaking awards, both local and international, and so others feel delivering Speech #10 should be easy for me. But it's not.

You see, I had to dig deep for the material for the speech. The goal was to inspire, and while I'm used to speaking to persuade (mostly by brute force and conviction, lol)-- I was not used to showing emotions when I am speaking. I thought the easiest way to make sure I forge an emotional connection with my audience, was to have my own personal connection with my speech. I had to feel strongly about the topic, and hopefully my sincerely intense emotions would be enough to move the audience. 

And so I chose a topic that until now, I feel strongly about. Bullying. I hate bullying, because once when I was a child, I was bullied too. I know the negative effects bullying has on one's self esteem, because once, I let bullies make me think I was worthless too. And then I thought, how can this painful episode in my life transcend a seemingly juvenile problem? How can the message be more all-encompassing, to include even those who were not bullied as children? I thought, while others are not bullied by people, they are bullied by life's circumstances. And I decided to include the story of how my grandfather, who was born dirt poor, managed to become one of our nation's most influential leaders during his time. 

I named my speech, "Push back"--short for the saying "When life pushes you, push back". I was agonizing over my material until the last minute before I spoke--hoping it would be enough to move the audience. As added pressure, it was the first time my mom would see me speak at toastmasters. She and Tito Fort came for my graduation, which was sweet but also nervewracking. I wanted to do extremely well.

And so I spoke, and I tried my best to remember my lines. In the middle of the story of how I was bullied, I had to take in a deep breath to calm my nerves. I was really feeling emotional, but I didn't know whether or not my gestures, facial expression and tone of voice were adequately conveying my emotions. I remember not knowing what to do with my hands. So I let go. I decided, I was just going to stand there to deliver my message. Who cares about the technicalities? If I overthink too much, I will only be bound to stumble. 

Before I knew it, my speech was over. I shook the toastmasters hand, I heard applause, and I immediately looked for Ulysses so I could collapse in his arms. I did it! It was over! I heard people talking, and the toastmaster saying, "a standing ovation please...", and I remember Ulysses nudging me, telling me that the toastmaster of the day was talking to me... but it was all a blur. All I could think of was that it's over. I've graduated. It's over!!!

It turns out I was so into my speech that I forgot to look at the time. I was undertime for the first time in recent memory! Instead of my usual 7 to 8 minute speeches, my graduation speech lasted only 6:58. There was a short debate / discussion whether or not I would be allowed to pass, or whether I should repeat, but my mentors decided I fulfilled the objectives of the speech, within time or not. I heaved a huge sigh of relief. I'll be getting my CC!

More importantly, people approached me during the break. At least 3 people (namely Joko, Liezel, and Marian) approached me saying they were almost in tears. Ralph confirmed that Joko indeed cried. Lol. And once I got home, I read a wall post from Michelle telling me that she's so happy she heard my speech, and that now she's convinced she too needs to "push back". Most of all, my mom was so proud. She said she twitted about my speech and how it exceeded all expectations. Another big sigh of relief. I am happy

I had two evaluators that evening--Jef and Jeeves--and at first I was nervous. What would they say? How horrible was my speech? And true to form, they showed me that in Toastmasters, there is no reason to fear evaluators. In fact, they inspired me to do better. Jeeves gave me much needed input on my recurring weakness: moving away from sheer passion and conviction (my strengths, since I've 5 years of debate to practice this) and moving towards openness and vulnerability and variety in vocals and actions. Love it. Jef told me something that I particularly appreciated. He said I should seek my audience. That there are kids bullied in schools, or underprivileged people bullied by circumstances in their lives that would benefit from hearing my speech. That was such a nice thing to hear, especially coming from a well-known motivational speaker like Jef. I am so happy and proud I didn't let either of them down, as I consider both of them true mentors in TM.

Now that I will be getting my CC, I want to push myself even further. Finishing that speech, I felt such a huge sense of accomplishment and growth that I want to do it again. This time, with the advanced modules. I want to take on something that terrifies me, to force me to grow and move out of my comfort zone. I will probably be getting the humorous or entertaining speaker, and/or both! Personally, I am inclined to take humorous. I am already thinking of my material.

Last night, I knew: this is what I want to be doing. This is my passion. Speaking. And who cares about all the awards I've received in the past, there is and always will be room for me to grow. To achieve, even more. And as long as I have this drive within me, as long as I keep on pushing myself to be even better, I know I'll be able to take this dream, this passion, this talent of mine to greater and greater heights  

Hurrrrray! I'm done!

Posted by anokaya at 11:52 AM | do go on

May 9th, 2012

Dugong Aso

Madalas nating marinig sa balita ang mga salitang "naghuhuramentado" at "nag-aamok." Ang una ay galing sa juramentado, wikang Kastila para sa mga taong "binigkis ng panunumpa" ng kanilang pananampalataya. Ikinabit ito sa mga mandirigmang Moro na handang ibuwis ang sariling buhay para sugpuin ang paglaganap ng Kristiyanismo. Samantala, ang ikalawa naman ay galing sa amuk, wikang Malay para sa mga taong nanunugod nang walang kaabag-abag at nag-aapoy sa galit ang mga mata.

Para sa media, iisa ang kahulugan ng dalawang salitang nabanggit gayong may historical at political na ugat ang una--ibig sabihin, kagitingan at katapangan--at ang ikalawa ay psychological--ibig sabihin ay pagkawala ng sariling bait ("nagdidilim ang paningin"/"nawawala sa sarili"). Kaya kapag nagwawala o nag-eeskandalo ang isang tao, sinasabing "naghuhuramentado" at "nag-aamok."

Kung mayaman naman ang nagwawala, ang tawag sa kanya ay "bipolar."

Hindi ba ganyan din ang mga tsismis tungkol kay Claudine Barretto lalo na noong maganap ang isang insidente sa bangko? ("Claudine Barretto "loses" account balance at a bank; money mysteriously disappears as she's about to withdraw it" - http://www.pep.ph/news/31647/claudine-barretto-loses-money-at-the-bank-money-mysteriously-disappeared-when-she-was-about-to-withdraw)

Ayon sa artikulong nabanggit, galit na galit diumano si Claudine sa nangyari at maririnig pa sa isang video ang pagtataas niya ng boses.

Kaya hindi na ako nagtaka kung tinaasan man niya ng boses ang empleyado ng Cebu Pacific. Sabagay, kung sa akin man mangyari ang insidente (9 sa 11 bagahe nila ay hindi isinabay sa eroplanong sinakyan nila) ay hindi ko rin maiiwasang mapikon. Ang kapal din naman kasi ng mukha ng Cebu Pacific para hindi sila abisuhan at sabihing normal lang ang ginawa nila. May termino pa nga raw dito -- "offloading policy" -- kaya hindi ito krimen.

Sa kabilang banda, halata namang scoop ang gusto ni Mon Tulfo. Sabi nga niya, isusulat niya ang insidente (pagrereklamo ni Claudine; pagmumura sa empleyada; paghahanap sa manager maging sa may-ari ng Cebu Pacific na si Gokongwei). Irate customer ang peg ni Claudine. Nagbayad siya sa serbisyo ng Cebu Pacific na palpak naman (hindi lang naman ito ang kapalpakang ginawa ng Cebu Pacific ngayong unang bahagi ng taon--alalahanin 'yung insidente ng matandang pinaglakad nila sa tarmac dahil may bayad ang kanilang wheelchair).

Bistado naman talaga si Mon Tulfo. Huwag niyang sabihing hindi niya kilala sina Claudine Barretto. Huwag siyang magtanga-tangahan dahil, unang-una, isa siyang journalist (journalist nga ba?) kaya inaasahang malawak ang kanyang kaalaman. Sigurado naman na pangalan ni Claudine Barretto ang ilalagay niya sa kanyang column sakaling hindi naganap ang pambubugbog sa kanya. Teka, sinabi niyang nilagay niya ang cellphone niya sa kanyang "paparazzi bag" so does that make him a self-confessed paparazzi? Ilan na bang paparazzi ang binugbog, sinampahan ng invasion of privacy at trespassing, at ikinulong?

Idagdag pa 'yung pambabanta ng magkakapatid na Tulfo kina Raymart at Claudine. Sabagay, kilala na sila sa pambabanta at pagmumura sa TV man o radyo. Walang sinasanto. Kahit hindi naman talaga 'yung may kasalanan ang nakasagot ng telepono, ipinapahiya nila sa TV at radyo. Nang mahimasmasan ay todo naman ang paghingi nila ng paumanhin.

May mga ganyan ka talagang makakasalubong. Mga dugong aso. 'Yung kumakain daw ng aso kaya ugaling aso. 'Yung kapag nakasagupa mo sa kalsada ay baka hindi lang mura at panunutok ng baril ang aabutin mo. Karamihan pa sa mga ganyan ay mga may matataas na ranggo sa militar o kamag-anak ng militar o pulis.

Clinical daw ang ganyan. Binansagan pa ngang "rage syndrome." Mas malala kaya ito sa pagiging bipolar? Nasa dugo kaya ito? Nasa kiwang ng utak? Nasa kinakain? Sa init? O dahil sa malapit ang buwan sa mundo (tulad noong supermoon) kaya marami ang nabubuang (lunatic) o nag-aasal mabangis na hayop (lycanthrope)?

Ang hindi nakakatawa ay mas pinagtuunan pa ng pansin ang insidente at binansagan pang "Thrilla in NAIA." Pansinin ang paliwanag sa artikulong "Headlining Trivia" (http://www.cmfr-phil.org/2012/05/07/headlining-trivia/).

Kasama sa mga element/katangian ng balita ang human interest pero tsismis nga ba ang tunay na interes ng taumbayan at hindi ang mga usapin patungkol sa kanilang mga batayang pangangailangan (food, shelter, clothing)? Bakit hindi naging headline ang hinaing ng mga mamimili dahil sa patuloy na pagtaas ng bilihin? Bakit hindi naging headline ang marahas na demolisyon?

Isa pang hindi nakakatawa ang mga bansag na "montulfo," "raymart," at "claudine." Pramis, ang layo ng mga ito sa talas ng mga bansag na Marcosian, Imeldific, Eraption, at ang pinaka-recent na Noynoying. Makapagpauso lang.

At ngayon, maaawa ba tayo sa bubug-saradong mukha ni Mon Tulfo o sa galos sa hita ni Claudine? Kanino na ngayon magsusumbong ang mga Tulfo? Buti na lang pala hindi nakita nina Raymart at Claudine 'yung (babaeng) kumuha ng video ng rambol at nag-upload sa youtube. Kung hindi, baka pati siya ay nabugbog.

Pero alin kaya ang totoo: Birds of the same feather flock together o Galit ang magnanakaw sa kapwa-magnanakaw?

Moral lesson: Huwag magsuot ng pink.

Sa dami naman ng mga nabasa kong opinyon tungkol dito, isa sa mga pinakamaayos ang FB status ni Fred Dabu:

affected ka ng barretto-santiago vs. tulfo/s brawl dahil:
a. nakaranas ka na ng palpak na serbisyo ng malalaking negosyo tulad ng sa transport industry
b. nakaranas ka na ng verbal abuse mula sa nagrereklamong client/s
c. na-picturan o na-youtube ka na ng labag sa iyong kalooban
d. napagbawalan ka nang kumuha ng litrato/video sa pampublikong lugar sa lehitimong pagkakataon
e. napagtangkaan ka nang agawan ng cell phone
f. nakaranas ka na ng threat, assault o "makuyog"
g. naiinis ka sa "sensationalism" ng mainstream media
h. naiinis ka sa abusadong pag-uugali
i. miron / usi lang na nakiki-trending
j. gustong maintindihan kung bakit napaka-init na isyu nito sa kabila ng pang-araw-araw o mas mabibigat na isyu na mas apektado ka naman pero wala ka nang gaanong masabi
k. naisipan pa lang o may tendency kang mag-react tulad nila sa nakakainis na sitwasyon
l. all of the above

Kayo, alin kayo dyan?

Posted by soulfly at 03:52 PM | do go on

May 8th, 2012

favorite Marx quote atbp

 

 

Anibersaryo last week ng umbrella organization na BAYAN (Bagong Alyansang Makabayan), May 5.

Ang BAYAN (parang 'Ang Bayan' ang peg) ay ang legal na alyansa ng sectoral groups na ang oryentasyon ay pambansa-demokratiko. Pambansa dahil hangad nito ang pambansang soberanya at demokratiko dahil hangad nito ang genuine land reform, pakikibaka sa katutubong pyudalismo at para itaguyod ang demokratikong karapatan ng sambayanan.

Ka-birthday pala ng BAYAN si Karl Marx. Katuwa 'no? Parang founding anniversary lang ng komite sentral ng Communist Party of the Philippines na birthday din ni Mao Zedong, December 26. Pati ang birthday ni Andres Bonifacio - November 30 - ay anibersaryo rin ng Kabataang Makabayan at Anakbayan.

Enwey, dahil birthday ni Karl Marx, nagtanong ang Kilusang Mayo Uno kung ano ang ating favorite Marx quote.

 

[Sorry, Virginia. He was not Santa Claus. Kalerks.]

 

Shempre nandyan na ang "Religion is the opium of the masses." Andyan na rin ang "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Maging ang panimula niya sa Communist Manifesto: "A specter is haunting Europe - the specter of communism."

Alam kong isang poet si Karl Marx at may mga love poem pa nga siyang isinulat noon. So naghanap ako ng medyo literary ang flavor. And I found this quote:

"What's sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose."

Ganda! Pero ano kaya ang ibig sabihin?

Posted by soulfly at 02:24 PM | do go on

May 7th, 2012

My deconversion story

my first communion

Every atheist has a deconversion story. Through all my years of blogging, I had never written one until now. So here it is finally

My deconversion story is a rather boring one. It’s probably more of an explanation than a story. There was no specific person or argument that de-converted me. There was no sudden realization. No soul searching happened. There was only a very gradual change in my way of thinking. For me, it was like a part of growing up. Like losing my belief in Santa

I think I may have always had atheistic inclinations. Even when I was religious my sense of amazement never had any spiritual context. I noticed that with a lot of theists (not all), whenever they’re filled with a sense of wonder about the cosmos, when they see particularly awe inspiring visions like a beautiful sunset, images of nebulae or when they’re confronted by an emotionally moving moment, they’re overcome by feelings of spiritual upliftment. That is a feeling that’s alien to me. I was always filled with a sense of wonder but it rarely had any element of spirituality, even when I still believed in a creator. I’ve been “spiritually challenged” for as far back as I can remember.

I guess that’s also the reason why losing my faith was so easy and uneventful for me.I never had the need for it. I never felt that my life wouldn’t have meaning without a sentient, supernatural creator. I never felt that I needed to be guided morally or in any other way by such an entity.

I was born into a Roman Catholic family, though my parents weren’t exactly what I would call religious. My father almost never goes to church unless he really has to. I don’t think I’ve ever heard him say things that a lot of Filipino Christians say like “let’s leave it up to god” or “trust in god’s judgment”. I don’t think I’ve ever actually seen him pray and I don’t remember him ever telling us that prayers could solve anything. He believes in a creator but I think he also believes that man makes his own fate.

I became an atheist pretty early in my life. I think I was about 9 or 11. As a child, I never read any book that explicitly advocated atheism. I didn’t read Dawkins and I wasn’t even aware of his work until I was already an atheist. Until now I still haven’t read “The God Delusion”. My reading material then consisted mostly of science books and journals. I bought copies of discover, scienfitic American, nature, discover, astronomy etc. every month. There was not a single article there that explicitly advocated atheism

One of my earliest memories of being a nonbeliever was when I was in grade 6. I remember having debates with my classmates then, who ironically listened to death metal and had Satanist symbols on their notebooks. You must be beyond evil if the Satanists are holier than thou. My last memory of being religious was 2-3 years earlier. I remember having a private teacher who was fanatically religious. I remember her saying silly things like “If evolution were true, why do we still have monkeys” Since (Read More)

Posted by jaywalker_1982 at 03:40 PM in On atheism | 1 hoodwinked

May 6th, 2012

Hurray for little achievements!

I'm so proud of myself I was able to make an online database for our business in minutes I hope Uly likes the new system, and I hope it helps us keep better track of our sales and after-sales program.

I'm so hungry! It's now time to eat  

Posted by anokaya at 01:55 PM | do go on

May 5th, 2012

bagong salin ng tula kong 'Sa Pagitan Natin' sa Kiniray-a ni Maam Gen Asenjo, Lapatop ni Allan Espiritu, at Akeanon ni John Barrios

http://patikimnimakoy.blogspot.com/2012/05/sa-ibat-ibang-wika-7.html

Posted by soulfly at 10:49 AM | do go on
« Newer · »